Association between mechanical power during one-lung ventilation and pulmonary complications after thoracoscopic lung resection surgery: a prospective observational study

Background The role of mechanical power on pulmonary outcomes after thoracic surgery with one-lung ventilation was unclear. We investigated the association between mechanical power and postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung resection surgery. Methods In this single-center, prospective observational study, 622 patients scheduled for thoracoscopic lung resection surgery were included. Volume control mode with lung protective ventilation strategies were implemented in all participants. The primary endpoint was a composite of postoperative pulmonary complications during hospital stay. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association between mechanical power and outcomes. Results The incidence of pulmonary complications after surgery during hospital stay was 24.6% (150 of 609 patients). The multivariable analysis showed that there was no link between mechanical power and postoperative pulmonary complications. Conclusions In patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung resection with standardized lung-protective ventilation, no association was found between mechanical power and postoperative pulmonary complications. Trial registration Trial registration number: ChiCTR2200058528, date of registration: April 10, 2022. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-024-02562-1.


Background
Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are common following lung resection surgery and remain a major determinant of postoperative morbidity and mortality [1].Lung-protective ventilation strategies are strongly recommended during thoracic surgery to reduce the incidence of PPCs [2,3].Protective ventilation during onelung ventilation (OLV) includes three parts: tidal volume (V T ) 4-6 ml/kg of predicted body weight (PBW), positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) 5-10 cmH 2 O and the recruitment maneuver [4].Nevertheless, the effect of isolated part on the pulmonary outcomes in the context of lung-protective ventilation remains controversial [5][6][7][8].
Recently, mechanical power (MP), that is the amount of energy per unit of time generated and converted to the respiratory system by the ventilator, combining volume, pressure, flow and respiratory rate (RR), has been proposed [9].MP, as a single variable, has been hypothesized to help estimate the contribution of the different ventilator-related causes of lung injury and of their variations.Previous retrospective studies reported that exposure to higher MP was associated with increased risk of mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) [10][11][12].Furthermore, MP normalized to lung size (MP normalized to PBW [norMP] or MP normalized to the compliance of respiratory system [MP/Crs]) has been suggested to have better discrimination power than the absolute MP value in ARDS patients [12,13].
However, evidence regarding MP and postoperative pulmonary outcomes for surgical patients was rare and mixed with divergent conclusions [14][15][16][17].A second analysis of a randomized clinical trial found that elevated MP during major noncardiothoracic surgery was independently correlated with increased risk of PPCs [15].In contrast, a prospective observational trial (n = 30) suggested that there existed no link between MP and pulmonary complications after thoracic surgery [14].
Clinical trials exploring the effect of MP on PPCs after thoracic surgery are requested [18,19].Therefore, we designed a prospective, observational study to evaluate the association between MP during OLV and pulmonary complications after thoracoscopic lung resection surgery.

Study design
We performed a single-center, prospective observational study, which was approved by Ethical Committee of the West China Hospital of Sichuan University (Ethical Committee No.2021 (1580) and registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2200058528, principal investigator: Hai Yu, date of registration: April 10, 2022.https:// www.chictr.org.cn/ showp roj.html?proj= 155531) before the first patient was enrolled.This report adhered to the applicable STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STORBE) statement [20].Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Participants
Adult patients (aged 18 years or older) undergoing elective thoracoscopic lung resection surgery with a duration of OLV ≥ 1 h were included.The exclusion criteria were: American Society of Anesthesiologists classification 4 or above; previous history of neuromuscular diseases or brain trauma or brain injury; acute lung injury or ARDS or severe chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases or previous lung surgery; severe hepatic insufficiency or renal failure requiring dialysis.

Perioperative management
Standard monitoring included electrocardiogram, non-invasive or invasive blood pressure, SpO 2 , endtidal carbon dioxide (ETCO 2 ), neuromuscular blockade and bispectral index (BIS) monitoring.Common or video double-lumen tube of the appropriate size (32-37 French) was chosen according to gender, height and chest radiograph.Correct placement of the common double-lumen tube was verified by fiberoptic bronchoscope both in the supine and lateral position.Intraoperative anesthetic management was at the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist according to routine practice.Anesthesia was maintained with volatile anesthetics or intravenous propofol targeting a BIS value between 40 and 60.The train-of-four (TOF) count was monitored every 15 min.Reversal of neuromuscular blockade was suggested with neostigmine of 0.04 mg/kg at a TOF count of at least 3. Multimodal analgesia including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, glucocorticoids, intercostal nerve blockade and patient-controlled intravenous analgesia was applied to maintain a numerical pain rating scale < 4 [21].
All participants were ventilated in volume control mode with a V T of 7 ml/kg of PBW during two-lung ventilation (TLV) and 5 ml/kg during OLV.Other parameters applied during mechanical ventilation were: PEEP level was determined by the attending anesthesiologist according to clinical guidelines (5-10 cmH 2 O) [22]; inspiratory pause of 20% to obtain the end-inspiratory plateau pressure (Pplat); inspiration: expiration ratio of 1:2; RR adjusted to maintain ETCO 2 between 35 and 45 mmHg; inspiratory oxygen fraction 1.0 during TLV and 0.4-0.5 during OLV to maintain SpO 2 > 92%.Manual recruitment maneuvers were performed immediately after tracheal intubation, the restart of TLV and the end of surgery with a continuous positive airway pressure of 30 cmH 2 O (TLV) or 20 cmH 2 O (OLV) for 15 s.
If hypoxemia occurred (defined as SpO 2 < 92% or PaO 2 < 60 mmHg without evidence of incorrect tube placement, airway obstruction, or hemodynamic impairment), immediate rescue recruitment maneuvers were performed on the ventilated lung.If this maneuver failed to enhance oxygenation, we incrementally increased the FiO 2 and applied continuous positive airway pressure of 5 cmH 2 O to the nonventilated lung.

Outcome measures
The primary outcome was a composite of PPCs during hospital stay (respiratory infection, respiratory failure, pleural effusion, atelectasis, pneumothorax and bronchospasm) [23,24].Secondary outcomes included: the severity grade of pulmonary complications [25]; length of hospital stay; all-cause mortality during hospital stay and at postoperative day 30.The severity grade of PPCs was scored on a 0-5 scale, where 0 indicates no symptoms or signals of PPCs, grades 1-4 indicates successively worse forms of complications, and grade 5 indicates death before discharge (A description of the diagnosis of PPCs and the severity grade of PPCs is given in Appendix 1, Table S1 and Table S2).
Baseline characteristics, intraoperative surgery-and anesthesia-related data were recorded.Intraoperative mechanical ventilation parameters were collected at four timepoints: 1) T1-lateral position during TLV; 2) T2-lateral position after 10 min of OLV; 3) T3-lateral position after 1 h of OLV; 4) T4-TLV after surgery.Ventilation data was collected every hour during OLV.Outcomes were evaluated every afternoon by trained investigators during postoperative visits until discharge and at postoperative day 30 by telephone.

Exposure
The primary exposure was MP measured after 1 h of OLV (T3).The following equation was applied to calculate MP, norMP and MP/Crs:

Statistical analysis
Sample size was calculated using the rule of ten [26,27].Sample size = 10 × number of factors and cofactors/ incidence of PPCs.On the basis of a 22% incidence of pulmonary complications after lung resection surgery [28,29], 13 factors and a dropout rate of 5%, we estimated a sample size of 622 patients would be sufficient for this study.
Continuous variables were described as mean [standard deviation {SD}] or median [interquartile range where Ppeak was the peak inspiratory pressure; PBW =

Results
Between April 2022 and November 2022, we recruited 622 patients in total and 609 participants were analyzed in this study.Figure 1 1.And there was no association between MP and in-hospital PPCs in the multivariable analysis (Fig. 3).In addition, MP was replaced by norMP and MP/Crs separately in multivariable analysis, and we did not detect association between norMP or MP/Crs and PPCs.During hospital stay, 14 and 6 patients experienced mild and moderate PPCs, respectively.The association between MP and the severity grade of PPCs cannot be assessed due to insufficient data.The length of hospital stay in patients with PPCs was longer than patients without PPCs (5[4-7] vs 4 [4,5], p < 0.001).There were no deaths during stay and at postoperative day 30.

Discussion
In this study conducted in patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung resection surgery, there existed no link between MP and the incidence of PPCs during hospital stay in the context of lung-protective ventilation.Ventilation characteristics keep changing over time during mechanical ventilation.According to the classical equation of MP proposed by Gattinoni et al. [9], the same MP can be achieved by different ventilation parameters, allowing MP a holistic indicator for monitoring mechanical ventilation.The effect of low tidal volume with or without PEEP on PPCs was uncertain, which indicated that MP was probably the determinant of pulmonary complications pathogenesis [5,6].
Previous retrospective data suggested that elevated MP was associated with higher mortality in critically ill patients [11,[30][31][32].Several clinical trials showed that the MP in ARDS patients receiving mechanical ventilation ranged from 15 to 29 J/min [11][12][13]31].Compared with ARDS patients, the absolute MP value was lower
Based on these above and existed evidence about high MP in ARDS patients, we suspected that MP is a beneficial indicator for critically ill patients or patients requiring long-time surgery.In other words, MP can evaluate precisely patients' prognosis when there existed great previous lung injuries or injuries caused by the ventilator.
To our knowledge, this is the largest prospective observational study to explore the association between MP and PPCs in thoracic surgical patients.Our findings could be generalized to ventilation approaches in thoracoscopic lung resection surgery using OLV.The present analysis also has some limitations.First, MP was determined by several ventilation variables, and the interaction among these variables during mechanical ventilation may confuse the association between MP and postoperative outcomes.In our study, the ventilator settings were similar among all participants, however, manipulating a single variable (such as PEEP), which correlates with variations in delivered MP, is likely a better approach to delineating its impact as Schujit et al. [35] investigated.Second, the result may not be wholly generalizable to other practices because the participants in our center were relatively young with healthy and underwent procedures of relatively short duration.Third, measurements of esophageal pressure were lacking.Therefore, MP calculating in our study was delivered by the ventilator to the whole respiratory system rather than lung separately.We used airway pressure instead of transpulmonary pressure to calculate MP, which was more accordant with clinical practice.

Conclusions
In a population of patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung resection with standardized lung-protective ventilation, we did not detect an association between mechanical power and postoperative pulmonary complications.

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 STORBE diagram.OLV: One-lung ventilation {IQR}] and analyzed using the Student t test or the Mann-Whitney U test for normal or nonnormal distributions, respectively.Normality was tested using the

Table 1
illustrates details about the enrolled and excluded participants.Baseline characteristics of patients are shown in Table1.In this study, median age was 55 years old and the majority of patients (68.1%) were female.Median duration of OLV was 90 min, thus ventilation parameters during OLV were only obtained twice in most patients.Ventilation characteristics of patients are presented in Table2.The ventilation data at T4 of one patient were not collected.Ventilation parameters including MP at any study time-point were similar between patients with PPCs and patients without PPCs (Table2).The distribution of MP during OLV is shown in Fig.2.The incidence of pulmonary complications after surgery during hospital stay was 24.6% (150 of 609 patients).The most common pulmonary complications Baseline characteristics of 609 patients Data are median[IQR]or n (%) BMI Body mass index, ASA American Society of Anesthesiologists, ARISCAT Assess respiratory risk in surgical patients in Catalonia, COPD Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, FEV1 Forced expiratory volume in one second, FVC Forced vital capacity, VATS Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, OLV One-lung ventilation

Table 2
Characteristics of mechanical ventilation during surgery

Table 2
(continued) Tidal volume, PBW Predicted body weight, RR Respiratory rate, Ppeak Peak inspiratory pressure, Pplat End-inspiratory plateau pressure, PEEP Positive endexpiratory pressure, Crs Compliance of the respiratory system, MP Mechanical power